Talk:Australian Railway Historical Society

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

earlier comments

edit

In effect, due to its status in railway history and preservation groups in Australia, and its importance in the documentation of rail heritage - I would argue for alevel up on the importance scale. User:SatuSuro 07:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is it the primary (and dominant) railway historical body in Australia? I've no idea from the stub, but if it is, yes, I'll agree it's just worth a mid. Just. :) --Iorek85 10:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

It obviously needs a lot of work on it, and thanks for believing me. As with all the others it will take time  :) User:SatuSuro 10:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

contents

edit

There is clearly room for some life in this stub of an article for mention of a number of the founding members like john buckland and singleton - to give it more life it reads like an address book rather than article SatuSuro 00:21, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Divisions

edit

Are the divisions really Divisions of a single national society, or are they legally separate, with the phrase "Suchandsuch Division" added to their names to make them sound as if they are sub-divisions? Tabletop (talk) 22:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Legally separate, incorporated bodies under the state laws as incorporated bodies - look at their web sites and you will see SatuSuro 00:23, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge from Australian Railway History

edit

I merged content from PRODded Austrailian Railway History. I believe that the merge will serve the overall content/context of the information better, as Austrailian Railway History seemed a little like a fork. I don't think there is enough there to warrent a seperate article. Roodog2k (talk) 13:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Support in the circumstances SatuSuro 13:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Australian Railway Historical Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply