Talk:Australian Aboriginal sign languages

Australia: Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Australian Aboriginal sign languages is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deaf

	This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

TOC edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Does anyone object to my placing __NOTOC__ in this article? The table of contents doesn't really seem to add much here, since the the article consists of the introduction (which doesn't appear in the TOC), a place holder for linguistics, a list of sign languages, a brief See Also, and a lengthy list of article references that takes up at least as much real estate as the rest of the article put together. I'll wait a couple of days to see if anyone feels differently. CKA3KA (Skazka) 17:47, 1 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I removed the table of contents. CKA3KA (Skazka) 01:57, 10 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There's a new poll here that would (hopefully) end all this "Indigenous" vs. "Aborigine" controversy. Feel free to vote. Zarbat 09:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic