Talk:AusLink

	Australia portal AusLink is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Completed projects: edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

When a project is completed, there is no need to list it because there are always newer and more exciting projects that come-up after that. It just uses up nearly twice as much space and that newer and more projects to come in the near future need to be listed in AUSLINK. The Albury Bypass opened on the Monday 5th March 2007 [1]. There is no need to list the Albury bypass now on the AUSLINK page. It is replaced in the AUSLINK list by an exciting 4-lane northbound road, that has started on the M5 Motorway near Ingleburn in Campbelltown [2]. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.168.1.97 (talk) 04:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

I think all of the AusLink major projects should be included. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not just about current events. If projects will not be interesting in ten years time, they shouldn't be listed now, either. See m:Wiki is not paper and WP:NOT#PAPER for more details. --Scott Davis ^Talk 09:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think that it would be more appropriate to separate the projects that were completed under auslink into a "finished" section but I agree that they should remain in the article. With AusLink 2 coming soon (the next round of 5 years of projects), the article should probably have some re-structuring or just re-wording of the statement at the top of the list that implicitly restricts it to the projects with completion dates specified in AusLink. There are projects such as the F3-to-Branxton link road (see Sydney-Newcastle Freeway) which have partial funding starting during the current AusLink period but not being completed until during AusLink 2. These don't currently fit on the list but I think that they should. --Athol Mullen 22:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Further information section edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have commented this out for the time being. It isa collection of links and does not relate to the narrative. I have no difficulty with the links if they were references for the text content but I think they add nothing to an encyclopaedia entry in their current form.

Could I also please put in a bid that web citations be in the form:

{{cite web  | last =   | first =   | authorlink =   | coauthors =   | year = 
 | url =   | title = 
 | format =  | work =  | publisher =  | accessdate = }}

Required parameters

url: URL of online item.
title: Title of online item.
date: Date (Month Day) when item was accessed. May be ISO 8601 YYYY-MM-DD format.
- year: Year when item was accessed. (Optional if ISO 8601 date used)

Optional parameters

author: Author
publishyear: Date published.
format: Format, i.e. PDF. HTTP implied if not specified.
work: If this item is part of a larger work, name of that work.
publisher: Publisher, if any.

and news references in the form:

{{cite news   | first=  | last=  | author=
  | url=
  | title=
  | work=   | publisher=  | pages=  | page=  | date=  | accessdate= }}

title is required, rest is optional.
author: Author
- last works with first to produce last, first
publisher: Publisher, if any.
accessdate: Date when item was accessed. Use ISO 8601 YYYY-MM-DD format.
work: If this item is part of a larger work, name of that work.
pages overrides page

Thanks --Golden Wattle ^talk 22:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pakemham bypass edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pakemham bypass is now complete and open to traffic (December 2007). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.177.173 (talk) 14:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, just a quick explanation of the reasoning behind the cleanup:

History: removing text based on dead links, renaming section Legislative Framework to suit revised content
National Network: removing unreferenced section
Road Funding: tidying formatting, updating and removing projects not built

Regards, 1292simon (talk) 13:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on AusLink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on AusLink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on AusLink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on AusLink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic