Talk:Aurora Tower (Cubao)

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good morning/afternoon/evening! Thanks for this well-formatted and well-written article. My biggest concern with this article is that based on the sources cited (and after an internet search), there does not seem to be quite enough independent and significant sources to verify that the Aurora Tower meets the General Notability Guideline. The GNG is the rule-of-thumb test to determine if a subject is notable enough to have a standalone article on Wikipedia. Many of the sources either either closely related to the subject (e.g. aranetacity.com is the website of the owner and operator of the tower), OR are advertisements for the property by real estate agents or similar services. Other sources only have trivial one-off mentions of the subject, and are not substantive enough to demonstrate notability. I'm marking patrolled at this point provided that the Urban Roamer and the government proclamation are enough (by my eye) to pass the minimum definition of the GNG, however this may well be a candidate for deletion if not improved. Thanks for the contribution, and happy editing! Bgv. (talk) 03:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)