Talk:Augustus Daniel Imms

Portrait?

Hi Anyone. Although the link to an external portrait is a lot better than nothing, I am nervous about its remaining indefinitely available at what looks like not a very powerfully supported site. I see that at its present location it appears to be at most covered by a creative commons licence. If no one presents any substantial objection before I get round to it, I intend to copy that photo with full acknowledgement and move it to the head of the article. For preference reply here. JonRichfield (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

I guess the problem is copyright law. If you can find a portrait published before 1923 it might be possible to argue for its being in the public domain, any later and we would have to wait for 70 years after the death of the photographer. Shyamal (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)