This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
I love you too. Now how about we get around to debating whether this fictional character needs her own page, please :) |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= Talk 22:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
No prob. Now, to the business at hand. The Audrey Hanson description in List of characters in Heroes has been getting rather long, so I expected someone to eventually create an article for her. Now, whether she deserves to have so much information written about her begs a larger question: how detailed should TV characters' descriptions be? Some of the main character articles are pretty lengthy for a show that's only about a dozen episodes old. Unfortunately, I haven't decided yet where I stand on this. Primogen 23:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Argh, fixed the Wikilink above. Primogen 01:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
First, as a random complaint, using excessive font tagging is quite unnecessary. Now on to business. Unless this can be expanded to a significant degree, it should probably be merged back for the meantime. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Agreed on merge. Sorry about the excessive font tagging; I'll modify my sig to remove it. |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= Talk 00:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply