Talk:Auditory brainstem response

Untitled

The following sentences appear to have been taken verbatim from the referenced eMedicine website: "The procedure was first described by Jewett and Williston in 1971. ABR audiometry is the most common application of auditory evoked responses. Test administration and interpretation are typically performed by an audiologist." I did not check if other text from this document was also copied, but unless permission was obtained this violates WebMD's copyright.

ABR/BAER

Why is the hospital performing this test on me. I am 65 years old and in good health, and I have pretty good hearing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.212.139.220 (talk) 19:29, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

I really can't say with any authority why they are doing this on you particularly; but generally it is done on adults where there is doubt about the veracity of the subjective (pure tone audiometry) results —Preceding unsigned comment added by Si1965 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Question moved from article.

A new user, Cwchet, posted a question in the article. I have removed it, and paste it here for consideration by an editor competent to answer this: "q: At Sample rate = 512, this provides only ~5 data samples during a time window of 10ms, which is far less than the 1000 minimum written below and too few to create a meaningfull waveform. Should this be 512k?" RolandR (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

No, it's definitely not 512k. The expression 'sample rate' is a bit misleading, to be honest. It actually refers to the number of data points plotted within the time window to create the waveform (on my machine it is labelled "#points"). The '1000 minimum' referred to in the question is a slightly different thing; this refers to the number of responses used to create the averaged waveform. BbBrock (talk) 11:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Generating sites

There's been some recent activity changing the generating sites of the waves of the ABR, and even how many waves there are, with no discussion. I think before any other changes are made on this topic, there should be discussion here of exactly what sources are being used for the information people want to add or subtract. If they are books or other sources most people do not have direct access to, I think quotations should be provided as well. Also, please do not use double-bracket links for Wiki articles that do not exist. Eflatmajor7th (talk) 04:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Auditory brainstem response. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060902205053/http://www.communication.northwestern.edu/publication/11873412261c717de6.pdf to http://www.communication.northwestern.edu/publication/11873412261c717de6.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901100702/https://www.communication.northwestern.edu/brainvolts/ to http://www.communication.northwestern.edu/brainvolts/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

"BAER" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BAER. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Merger discussion

I want to merge this page Brainstem auditory evoked potential to this page Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 04:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)