Talk:Auctorum

Tree of Life Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What about "auct. s.lat."? edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I encountered this in the following journal article title: Braun, Uwe; Shishkoff, Nina; Takamatsu, Susumu (2001). "Phylogeny of Podosphaera sect. Sphaerotheca subsect. Magnicellulatae (Sphaerotheca fuliginea auct. s.lat.) inferred from rDNA ITS sequences – a taxonomic interpretation". Schlechtendalia. 7: 45–52. Retrieved 10 August 2015. It's only used in the title and the abstract, and googling for this string has produced nothing useful. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 19:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

auctorum sensu lato = in a wider/broader sense according to these authors Shyamal (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

auct. was already a redirect; I've made s.lat. one as well. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply