This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
We now have seven references to reviews in the article, but the only inofrmation we have from them is:
That the books exist (already verifiable from their ISBNs)
That the NYT thinks that Burl is "the leading authority on British stone circles"
I am quite sure that the reviews must mention the books that they are reviewing somewhere, so what do the say about them? HrafnTalkStalk(P) 04:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Stonehenge People: An Exploration of Life in Neolithic Britain, 4700-2000 B. C. is actually by Rodney Castleden, not Burl:
DOI: 10.2307/505497
https://www.jstor.org/stable/505497Sommerx2015 (talk) 11:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
