Talk:Attenborites

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Rugoconites Tenuirugosus in topic Species or genus?

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:06, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

genus name - etymology

edit

Named in honor of Sir David Attenborough.

Ref.: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/972032

--Ernsts (talk) 16:55, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Ernsts. I happen to have arrived here via a different route, and used the exisiting citations and a couple from the List of things named after David Attnborough article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:09, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Species or genus?

edit

The article name appears to be the genus (which I assume is a single-species one at present), but the article did not explain this, and only the species was bolded. I'm not sure what the rules are about articles for genus and species, but I have attempted to make it a bit more comprehensible to the layperson, and have also added a redirect from Attenborites janeae. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:09, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article is about the only species in the genus Attenborites. The genus Attenborites is monotypic which means that the article focuses more on the species. An introduction to a species in a monotypic genus seems repetitive and plus the Taxobox of the article already includes most information about the subject (Binomial & species part). Rugoconites Tenuirugosus (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply