Talk:Attempted assassination of Leonid Brezhnev

stubbed

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


 
I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac (Doc) 20:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

De-stubbed and de-started after complete rewrite. SteveStrummer (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Seems highly editorialized

edit

There are coverups of assassination attempts on US and other nation's presidents all the time, yet I don't see anyone here attempting to cast them as "a classic example of obfuscation and disinformation." It just seems as though the editor is taking what would otherwise be a pretty typical event and making it seem different because it happened in the Soviet Union and fits a narrative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.224.74 (talk) 03:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

As the editor who wrote that, I'd say that I'm not trying to "cast" things in any particular color. It is simply a fact that the virtual news blackout regarding the assassination attempt was regarded as a coverup by most Western (at least English-speaking) observers. It is described as such not only in the two sources cited, but in most of the other references as well. The article text neither supports nor denies this interpretation, but only points out that it has been a commonly-held view. SteveStrummer (talk) 03:51, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
"Western" media is currently in a state of heightened propaganda war against Russia, so this is the reality we have to live in for now. -G — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.29.133.166 (talk) 00:33, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
No, not even in Canada, but thanks for ignoring the TP rules about WP:FORUM. 104.169.17.29 (talk) 09:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply