Talk:Atlantic Boulevard (Los Angeles County)

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move; thus no move. Although there are more !votes to move than there are to keep the current arrangement, the votes to move seem to be based on an implicit assumption that the road in California is the primary topic for this term. (Note that WP:TWODABS, which is cited as a reason for the move, calls for the title to point to one of the articles only when that article is the primary topic; when there is no primary topic, it recommends making the title into a disambiguation page.) The existence of a primary topic for "Atlantic Boulevard" is not established, and none of the discussion participants has tried to do so. The fact that no other articles exist with this particular title does not demonstrate that the California road is the primary topic for the term. No other reasoning has been provided for the theory that the California road is the primary topic, and a strong argument could be made that at least one of the two Florida roads is of equal primacy. Orlady (talk) 05:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

---

Atlantic Boulevard (Los Angeles County) → Atlantic Boulevard — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Right now, Atlantic Boulevard is a disamb page with only three entries. One of them is red, and one of them is to a state highway in Florida whose article title doesn't contain "Atlantic Boulevard". Per the conventions for two-prongers, we should redirect/move the title to one of them, and hatnote to the other (and possibly also to Atlantic Avenue, a disam page that has more titles). In addition, the current title is very unlikely to be searched for...most people would not include the county or would search for Long Beach or any of the other cities Atlantic runs through Purplebackpack89 01:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

• Object it is not a dismabiguation page, it is a WP:SETINDEX. 76.66.202.72 (talk) 04:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

It still needs to be done away with since there's only one and one-half entries Purplebackpack89 05:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose. Atlantic Boulevard is now a standard disambig page with 3 main entries and a "see also" entry. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

But of those main entries, one isn't named Atlantic Boulevard and one's a redlink... This page is the only article named Atlantic Boulevard; the FL highway and the see also can be hatnoted Purplebackpack89 06:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support per nom. If the redlink article ever gets written, we can revisit. But for now, the L.A. street is the only article actually titled "Atlantic Boulevard". Dohn joe (talk) 01:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support and delete the dab page per User:Dohn joe. Use a hatnote instead. — AjaxSmack 01:53, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
• Support per nom and WP:TWODABS. --TorriTorri(^talk/_contribs) 00:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atlantic Boulevard (Los Angeles County). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150801011935/http://parks.lacounty.gov:80/wps/portal/dpr/Parks/Atlantic_Avenue_Park to http://parks.lacounty.gov/wps/portal/dpr/Parks/Atlantic_Avenue_Park

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)