Talk:Asuran characters in Stargate

birthplace

wouldnt oberoth have been born on atlantis? -Xornok 00:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I thought the Ancient nanite experiment took place on Asuras. The entry in Atlantis' database mentioned a small research outpost on Asuras after all. Maartentje 07:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

tense

shouldnt it be "is" and not "was"? -Xornok 02:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Asuras exploded while he was on it, so he is supposed to be dead... So shouldn't it be 'was'? Maartentje 02:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

maybe for oberoth, but niam is also "was"... -Xornok 02:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

His status is unknown at the time, so we should maybe just leave it alone... However, he will be mentioned in the upcoming Atlantis ep The Return, Part 2, so maybe we should just wait til then... Maartentje 12:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

well, he was very much alive at the end of progeny, he blinked, i believe... and since he doesnt need air to breathe, he may still be alive... -Xornok 19:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Why do they all die?

Why is it that no Asuran character appears in more than a few episodes? I would like to see a recurring villian rather than the race as a collective being the villains. I thought that Oberoth was going to come back because all their knowledge is merged/shared but I guess they don't do that in that way.

Also, why are Cetus and Talus considered "major characters" exactly? They hardly had any speaking parts and their names weren't even given onscreen. Can anyone explain that?

Also, is it just me or did the Asurans in "The Return, Pt. 2" look like Turtles with those weird uniforms. Are they some sort of battle uniforms or what?

Faris b 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

oh well, ori characters have a rather low life expectancy too, so I wouldn't worry about it. and you're forgetting that everything related to the Ancients can't survive for more then two episodes in atlantis!

and one other thing, Cetus and Talus weren't really major characters, but an article composed of two characters is just pathetic... Maartentje 11:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Niam (Progeny).jpg

Image:Niam (Progeny).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)