Talk:Astoria Park/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Add alt text to every image being used.
• "pool and bathhouse was" → "pool and bathhouse were"
• Remove the comma after "glass brick columns".
• "local resident" - is "local" necessary (both times)?
• "grand stands" should be one word.
• "play field" should be one word.
• "a playground and a restroom on the pool's southwest side was" → "a playground and a restroom on the pool's southwest side were"
• "northern playground and its restroom was" → "northern playground and its restroom were"
• "Ssome" - typo?
• Wikilink The New York Times and Robert Moses.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks. I've fixed all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 01:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)