Talk:Association of Chartered Certified Accountants/Archives/2021
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Idell in topic February 2021
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
February 2021
Moved from User talk:IdellHi Idell, you removed my contribution to ACCA page and stated " Information icon Hello, I'm Idell. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Association of Chartered Certified Accountants have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Idell (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
I am not sure if they are defamatory or libellous, howver, what I wrote is based on facts and if facts are defamatory or libellous, then these facts needso be changed rather then asking me to to tell world truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.235.57 (talk) 19:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello! The tone of your additions seems very defamatory, to which I can say that Wikipedia is not a forum for free speech or a battleground. In my recent edit, I removed parts of your additions that misconstrued the reasons for a judgement delivered by the subject's disciplinary committee. In fact, according to your citation, in the course of their investigation, they made multiple attempts to communicate with the accused, which they received no response to; and the actual proceedings were brought about for and the decision was based on several other reasons. Other edits have been disruptive for similar reasons.
- I think I have adequately explained on your talk page what kind of sources (reliable, according to Wikipedia; and secondary, tertiary, etc.) you need to cite for any changes. (The subject's own website or PDF documents, random blogs or forums and first party/non-independent sources are unlikely to be reliable.) Do not analyze material in a way that serves to reach a conclusion not stated by the sources. It is not good enough for information to be true, if it is not verifiable (WP:Verifiability, not truth). Please follow the blue hyperlinks for further guidance. Idell (talk) 23:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)