Talk:Assembly of the Delegates of the Slovene Nation

WP:MOS Notes and References

Please don't mess around with the WP:MOS structure. I put it in place because it is in line with WP:MOS. I really don't care what you call it, some people call it References and Bibliography, some call it Notes and References. But the etiquette is that if someone creates the structure, it stays in place. A list of References for the topic (ie cited books) etc as well as Notes (inline citations) is appropriate for every article. It starts the process of moving it forward from a stub article. I will reinstate the structure as I made it. Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Notes is used for explanatory notes, References is used for inline citations, Further reading is used for editor-recommended books. What mess do you see here? --Eleassar ^{my talk} 10:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

read WP:MOS, WP:GENREF, and [[1]]. Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

I have read it several times and still don't understand what you mean. Current layout seems ok to me (Tomašević's reference lists much more data than before). --Eleassar ^{my talk} 16:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)