Talk:Assault boat

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Assault boat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://milhist.net/docs/milencyc/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724205038/http://www.40thengineers.org/storm_boats.htm to http://www.40thengineers.org/storm_boats.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Worldwide View Tag

I can only assume this tag was placed because it is missing German (and Canadian) assault boats. German boats required the U.S. (and probably British) to field them too. It is only my assumption as I did not place the notice. Johnvr4 (talk) 15:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

U.S. Storm boats.

I'll be updating this section. Johnvr4 (talk) 15:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Encyclopedic tone

I'm going to be looking at the "Overview of the differences between British and American Storm and Assault Boats" section to hopefully try and make it look more encyclopedic. I don't like the entire layout of the article, and I am pretty sure that a lot of this section needs better citations, but I want to get the wording out of the way before I decide how to move forward.

IrisPersephone (talk) 13:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

It gets worse. I took a look at the source cited and the entire section seems to be more-or-less copy-pasted directly. This might take longer than I thought.

IrisPersephone (talk) 13:47, 8 December 2022 (UTC)