Talk:Asphodelaceae

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Richardh9935 in topic Confused article

Confused article edit

As of 10 May 2011, this article is confused between the Xanthorrhoeaceae sensu APG III and the Xanthorrhoeaceae sensu stricto. It needs quite a bit of re-writing which I don't have time for now. I hope someone else does! Peter coxhead (talk) 21:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

2022:
ITIS.GOV says Asphodelaceae is only a synonym of Xanthorrhoeaceae, while I failed to find Xanthorrhoea (blackboy) at all in ITIS.GOV. The nearest I got was this article and the Wikipedia article on Xanthorrhoea. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xanthorrhoea
Has Xanthorrhoea fallen between the cracks? Richardh9935 (talk) 06:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Asphodelaceae/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Trying to make it at least B class...Vrkunkel (talk) 07:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 07:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asphodelaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply