 | Askeladd has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 20, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Askeladd/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 20:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Creation edit
- This sentence feels a bit odd: "While strange, he felt like it was a product of chance."
- Done
- The second paragraph feels like it needs some tweaking, as it's introducing things to the reader while assuming the reader is already aware of them (interactions with other characters we haven't heard about, his character traits etc).
- Revised. I forgot to introduce Prince Canute.
Reception edit
- I believe the paper title should be italicized, but also make note it is a paper so people understand what's being referenced.
- Added italics for every publication.
That's...actually all the issues I have. Overall this is a pretty solid read and a surprisingly interesting character.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC) @Kung Fu Man: Thanks for the review-Tintor2 (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Alright, checked sources 34, 36 and 37 among others for accurate statements, passing.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.