Talk:Asian News International
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Asian News International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928181836/http://www.eamedia.org/history/2006/report/global_news to http://www.eamedia.org/history/2006/report/global_news
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Space edit
@Gazoth: "Inappropriate to link from article space." Is this not accepted practice? For example, Sysop links to Wikipedia:Administrators. Benjamin (talk) 06:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Benjaminikuta, I was mistaken, it seems to be an accepted practice. I felt that it would be inappropriate to distinguish from internal pages that a small fraction of readers would find relevant, but it looks like the community feels otherwise. —Gazoth (talk) 15:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Benjaminikuta, on second thought, why did you add it here? I assumed that ANI redirects here, but it redirects to a disambiguation page that already links to WP:ANI. I don't see a need to distinguish WP:ANI from every page that abbreviates to ANI. —Gazoth (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- This page was the first Wikipedia Google result for ANI. Benjamin (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Benjaminikuta, that is subjective and depends on your search history. For me, this page is not even on the first 10 results for "ANI". Secondly, why would a person who opened a page for "Asian News International" be confused that it doesn't lead to WP:ANI? —Gazoth (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- This page was the first Wikipedia Google result for ANI. Benjamin (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Removal of Critisism Section edit
All the references in the Critisism section is opinionated and based on unreliable sources. Must be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dheerajmpai23 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Cleanup required! edit
This article (Asian News International) currently has 29 references to a single magazine article behind a paywall:
- Donthi, Praveen (1 March 2019). "The Image Makers : How ANI Reports The Government's Version Of Truth". The Caravan. Retrieved 2019-12-07.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Please provide citations from multiple, better sources (ideally not behind a paywall). Thanks!
--Test9753 (talk) 00:04, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
The article seems thoroughly biased and immensely selective on criticism. Needs to be checked and re-edited. Sreekanth yerram 17:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sriyerram (talk • contribs)
BBC source edit
What if anything should be added based on this source [1]?SovalValtos (talk) 05:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asian_News_International&diff=993738804&oldid=993590750 - Why? Please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrangaBellam (talk • contribs) 06:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § RfC: Asian News International (ANI). Walrus Ji (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Reliability of criticism edit
the controversy section is mostly cited from single source The Caravan. I that an unbiased and reliable source? Vikash kumar thakur (talk) 13:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 26 December 2022 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
114.79.142.90 (talk) 20:00, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Ani is a nurtal news channel,infact alt news is biggest fake and propoganda fact checker
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Khrincan (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
