Talk:Asgill Affair
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Gråbergs Gråa Sång in topic This picture
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asgill Affair article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
This picture edit
I see it's been discussed at Talk:Asgill_Affair/Archive_1#Artist’s_impression_of_the_drawing_of_lots,_based_on_archive_material, but my knee-jerk reaction is "WP:SPS fan-art." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- I would agree. I'm sure a great deal of energy was expended upon the potential accuracy, etc. but it's still an educated guess with a lack of authoritative scholarship behind it, and it's just not a good image beyond that. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 14:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Fwiw, theisleofthanetnews.com thought it was good enough to publish:[1]. Maybe a bit blog-ish[2]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Was this really done to the sound of drumrolls? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)