Talk:Aselsan

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kraligor in topic Notable Members

F-16 IFF hack and the killing of three edit

Added info on the three Aselsan engineers who were assasinated after they managed to open up the secret US-made codes for F-16 fighter plane IFF system. They are considered heros and martyrs in Turkey, they helped the country defend its souvereignity of the airspace. 82.131.210.162 09:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please spare us of the conspiracy theories and your "martyrs", OK?

85.73.83.194 16:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

That F-16 thing is a story. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.179.137.124 (talk) 09:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

This F-16 thing is a big lie. Don't believe it. I am an employee in that corporation and I for sure know that this is bullshit. One of them left the corporation 7 years ago. One of the other two was a mechanical engineer. Come on. Mechanical. The other one was a programmer. They say he felt himself unsuccesful at gradute school. He apperantly had issues with his supervisor at school. These three were not a team, like those idiots claim. Don't let them fool you. (I feel sorry for all three.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.231.126.200 (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removed the completely fictional, utter bullshit "F-16 IFF" story. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.181.251.9 (talk) 21:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

F-16 IFF story is unsourced and potentially harmful, as such its inclusion in wiki is inappropriate, until and unless it can be properly sourced. If someone feels strongly enough aboput this to revert its removal, source it. 11:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ASELSAN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ASELSAN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ASELSAN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notable Members edit

How are they notable? And if they are notable, why don't they have Wikipedia entries on their own? --Kraligor (talk) 13:00, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm deleting the section now, as I still can't see how they are notable. The CEO is already mentioned in the infobox, and the investor isn't coming up in a google search. They aren't mentioned in the TR article either, so the info might be outdated anyway. --Kraligor (talk) 15:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply