Talk:Asclepiadoideae

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Peter coxhead in topic Other genera in Endress

Post to <sastapeliads@yahoogroups.com , asking for help with this article/section edit


Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:30:42 -0500 From: "Willy Wonka" <willy900wonka@gmail.com> To: "Sastapeliads" <sastapeliads@yahoogroups.com>, willy900wonka@yahoo.com Subject: Asclepiadaceae on Wikipedia Hello all,

I recently discovered that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asclepiadaceae is a very sparsely populated back bone of a section on Wikipedia. Wiki is a free on line encyclopedia. Dr.'s Loukie Viljoen and Fabio d'Alessi have a wonderful site, rich with features and accessories, and above all information. The comparison is appalling. Hoodia of course is there.

I am suggesting that those who have a mind to allow wiki to use some of their non-proprietary information, and have some time to do so, help the wikipedia section.

   * The process is easy.
   *  1) create an account - free;
   *   2) goto the above link;
   *  3)read, then choose a red (non-existent) link;
   *  4) once at the non-existent link, you will be asked if you want to create this page;
   *  5) (if yes) a gui editor will appear  - pictures are uploaded using the upload command from the side bar or simply refer to them and it will prompt u;
   *  6) use (edit) any page as a template.


I don't want this to defer energies from the fore mentioned work of Loukie, so I reluctantly add this here. There are several projects that interest me. Keeping information and knowledge for our progeny / posterity is one.

Please let me know if I am off base and over-stepping my bounds.

Thank you for your understanding, Willy -

BTW I will enter this for everyone to access in the d iscussion tab of the article.



For consistency with other Wikipedia articles, the non-Wikipedia links within the article should be moved to an "External links" section at the end. MrDarwin 20:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asclepiadoideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Asclepiadoideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Other genera in Endress edit

Treatment of the genera listed in "Other genera" by Endress 2000,[1] 2014,[2] and 2018[3] + GRIN-Global

Genus 2000 2014 2018 GRIN (as of December 2023)
Dalzielia not mentioned not mentioned synonym Possible synonym of Marsdenia (Marsdenieae)
Decanema not mentioned not mentioned synonym Possible synonym of Cynanchum (Asclepiadeae)
Dischidanthus not mentioned not mentioned synonym Possible synonym of Marsdenia (Marsdenieae)
Gymnemopsis not mentioned not mentioned not mentioned Synonym of Marsdenia (Marsdenieae)
Kerbera accepted not mentioned synonym Synonym of Melinia (Asclepiadeae)
Leichhardtia not mentioned not mentioned synonym Not present
Manothrix not mentioned not mentioned not mentioned uncertain genus
Periglossum not mentioned not mentioned accepted Possible synonym of Cordylogyne (Asclepiadeae)
Polystemma accepted not mentioned accepted Possible synonym of Matelea (Asclepiadeae)
Ptycanthera not mentioned not mentioned accepted Synonym of Matelea (Asclepiadeae)
Ruehssia not mentioned not mentioned not mentioned Synonym of Marsdenia (Marsdenieae)
Schistonema accepted not mentioned synonym Possible synonym of Tweedia (Asclepiadeae)
Vailia accepted not mentioned synonym Possible synonym of Blepharodon (Asclepiadeae)

Everything that is accepted in 2000 or 2018 is in Asclepiadeae.

Plantdrew (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Useful, thanks. For reference I added what GRIN says as of 4 December 2023. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Endress, M. E. and P. V. Bruyns (2000), "A revised classification of the Apocynaceae s.l." (PDF), Botanical Review, 66 (1): 1–56, doi:10.1007/BF02857781
  2. ^ Endress, Mary E.; Liede-Schumann, Sigrid; Meve, Ulrich (2014). "An updated classification for Apocynaceae". Phytotaxa. 159 (3): 175–194. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.159.3.2. ISSN 1179-3163.
  3. ^ Kadereit, Joachim W.; Bittrich, Volker (2019-04-11). Flowering Plants. Eudicots : Apiales, Gentianales (except Rubiaceae). Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-93604-8.