Talk:Ascidiacea

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Soap in topic õne eye or two?

The Sea Squirt does have a brain

edit

For a while as explained by Dr. Daniel Wolpert. TED video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s0CpRfyYp8&feature=youtu.be

Basically the Sea Squirt eats its own brain after settling down somewhere. Could be beneficial to add it to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.156.83.80 (talk) 16:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Comment

edit

I added the information that some ascidians are eaten in some countries. Aside from my personal knowledge of their being eaten in Japan, my source is the Japanese wikipedia article on sea squirts. I've added that as a reference, but I'm not sure if that is the right way to do this. Perhaps some more experienced wikipedian can change this if it isn't the correct way to cross-reference.Bill 03:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

"Kowalesky" per letter of Thomas Huxley

edit

Can anybody track down / make any necessary redirects / start article if necessary for "Kowalesky" per letter of Thomas Huxley [1] - "Kowalesky could never have announced his great discovery of the affinity of the Ascidians and Vertebrates, by which zoologists had been startled." -- May be AKA "Kowalski", but I can't find a likely reference. -- (Hmm, Kazimierz Kowalski? - in which case we need an article.) -- Writtenonsand 14:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

If anyone's still interested, it was Alexander Kowalevsky. See Evolutionary developmental biology#Evolutionary morphology. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

New species

edit

NEW SPECY FOUND OFF AUSTRALIA, PLEASE INCLUDE ON PAGE http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/One-Australia39s-deepest-residents-carnivorous-sea-squirt-ascidian-standing-half/photo//090118/photos_sc_afp/3d0d6adfb6d1adbd7de2de9172f3a747//s:/afp/20090118/sc_afp/scienceoceansanimalswarmingaustralia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.29.2 (talk) 20:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

cdna count =

edit

It's rather 1.2 Million cdnas, right? See [NCBI. Have not changed the page yet, though Maximilianh (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Seasquirt.jpg to appear as POTD soon

edit

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Seasquirt.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 21, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-04-21. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 18:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

A nudibranch (Nembrotha lineolata, right) lays eggs in a spiral pattern on a sea squirt (Polycarpa aurata). Sea squirts are sessile filter feeding marine animals found in shallow waters throughout the world's oceans. They are the natural prey of many animals and are consumed by humans as well.Photo: Nick Hobgood
edit

Two links were broken. I left the references but deleted the links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.9.112.31 (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Homeobox gene experiment.

edit

There have been experiments where ordinary seasquirts have been altered in one position in one homeobox gene. That resulted in their hearts changing from one-chambered to two-chambered and starting to pump blood in the same way as fish. Can anyone find the specific reference(s) for this and add it to the article?109.58.147.35 (talk) 08:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Found this popular article on the topic: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060930094021.htm
The relevant paper is: Davidson B, Shi W, Beh J, Christiaen L, Levine M (2006) FGF signaling delineates the cardiac progenitor field in the simple chordate, Ciona intestinalis. Genes and Development 20(19):2728-38.
I'll leave it to a biologist to determine if this is worth including. 0x0077BE (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

paraphyletic

edit

According to the tunicates article, "newer evidence suggests the Ascidiacea are an artificial group of paraphyletic status.[15][16]". Most of the content of this article (e.g. anatomy sections, colonialism, reproduction, life cycle, ecology and fossil record) is likely to be nonspecific to ascidians. Shouldn't most sections of material be moved into tunicates, and the lead be updated to reflect the current best information on classification? Cesiumfrog (talk) 23:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

In this revision of the article, a link to siphon (mollusc) was added, although tunicates are not molluscs. Can this link be replaced with something more accurate? Jarble (talk) 19:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yeah it was wrong. I've added a brief gloss - it's a tube. The anatomy is explained in the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sea squirt redirects

edit

Sea squirt redirects to Ascidiacea, while Sea squirts, Sea Squirt and Sea Squirts redirect to Tunicate. I have propose that the latter three be retargetted so all point to Ascidiacea - you are invited to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 September 17#Sea squirt. Please leave any comments there to keep discussion in one place. Thryduulf (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

õne eye or two?

edit

do the larvae have one eye or two? is this a top-down view, or from the side? Soap 04:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply