Talk:Asaba

Latest comment: 2 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move 4 December 2021

Asaba (city) edit

Hello @Jamie Tubers:, how about we move the page to Asaba (city) instead. That way the common name as you said stands out. Stanleytux (talk) 22:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • We've had a discussion similar to this in the past; the guideline on wikipedia (WP:NCDAB) is that: when it is time to disambiguate a place, the norm is to disambiguate with the higher division where it belongs. In this case, Asaba is a city, and its higher division is a state. That is the normal way to disambiguate a city name - Oh there's even a similar scenario right on the page: there's a hatnote pointing to "Asaba, Shizuoka", a chinese town. That is the guideline. Is there a particular reason why you think this method is not sufficient in this case?--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Jamie Tubers:, you know very well that Asaba is a city and not a town, you campare it to the Japanese town, and we can't use the naming patterns for towns and counties or local government areas for cities. How many cities are named that way on Wikipedia? The common way of disambiguating cities here is by using "(city)" after city name, or simply including City as in Tai (city) and in Oklahoma City. Stanleytux (talk) 06:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • There's a guideline on Wikipedia, which i already cited above. Tai is an exception probably because it is not a city existing in present day...so no subdivision to disambiguate with. "Oklahoma city" is a common name, just like "Benin City". "Asaba City" is not a common name. As it stands; "Asaba, Delta" is the appropriate title, per wikipedia guideline. Want examples? 1, 2, or click on any category listing cities.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asaba, Delta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Addition of unsourced material edit

Certain editors are bent on placing the following material into this article.

  • ...lower Niger River, which divides Igboland into two unequal parts...
  • Asaba is generally known as .... the western section of Igboland...

They offer this source as a reference for the statements. Looking at the source, it is clear that the expression "Asaba is generally known as the western section of Igboland" does not appear in the source. The source does not even mention Asaba. Adding this expression therefore is an issue of original research. Furthermore, the source itself, is a primary source, and is un-vetted, meaning that the material has not gone through varying levels of rigorous third-party academic peer review, and therefore the source does not meet the requirements of WP:SCHOLARSHIP. Just fyi, I don't care if Asaba is the western section of Igboland or not. I don't care about that. What I am interested in, is having Wikipedia articles properly sourced with verifiable and reliable sources. Apart from all this, this article is about Asaba, and not about Igboland or the River Niger. Musings and observations about Igboland and River Niger should be done in their respective Wikipedia articles. If you do find a reliable source to back up the claim of "Asaba being generally known as the western section of Igboland", please feel to re-add the material with the reliable source. Thank you. 78.49.184.211 (talk) 08:44, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


Requested move 4 December 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved Asaba, DeltaAsaba and AsabaAsaba (disambiguation) per nom. No such user (talk) 12:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


– Without 'Nigeria', it doesn't look like a place. Josedimaria237 (talk) 18:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook(talk) 04:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. Danski454 (talk) 00:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment Asaba, Nigeria is also an option. The vast majority of articles titled this way in Nigeria do not use the word "State" in the placename, but I'm not sure that's correct. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 21:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@: Asaba, Nigeria should be the correct name. Josedimaria237 (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Crouch, Swale The proposal says 'Asaba, Nigeria' not 'Asaba, Delta State'.

Josedimaria237 (talk) 23:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's because you've changed it, my opposition is to the original suggestion to Asaba, Delta State. Crouch, Swale (talk) 07:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I changed it because that's a better name.

Josedimaria237 (talk) 17:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.