Talk:Arundel

Does anyone that would actually read this article really care about anne arundel in the USA? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.102.51 (talk) 19:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

I doubt it, and I have removed it from the article as irrelevant. JdeJ (talk) 08:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Merge proposal

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish (Arundel) should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.

Therefore, I suggest villages within the parish (Tortington) to be merged and redirected to Arundel. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 01:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Merged ++ MortimerCat (talk) 13:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Broken Wikipedia page

Page incorrectly served in low-res / small-screen 'mobile' version to high-res / large-screen tablet computers.

This error is widespread in Wikipedia and harks back to the early, low-res / small-screen 'feature phones'. The idea has long been superseded by high-res, zoomable smartphones / tablets and should have been dropped long ago by Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.99.174 (talk) 09:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arundel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090608154344/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk:80/ccm/content/your-council/news-room/facts-about-west-sussex.en?page=2 to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/ccm/content/your-council/news-room/facts-about-west-sussex.en?page=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:06, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arundel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307015351/http://www.fairtrade.org.uk:80/get_involved/campaigns/fairtrade_towns/default.aspx to http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/get_involved/campaigns/fairtrade_towns/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arundel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309051251/http://www.arundelscouts.org.uk/magazine/1st%20Arundel%20Scout%20Group%20-%20Forward%20Once%20More%20-%20Jan08.pdf to http://www.arundelscouts.org.uk/magazine/1st%20Arundel%20Scout%20Group%20-%20Forward%20Once%20More%20-%20Jan08.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arundel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130908024612/http://www.romanmap.com/htm/nomina/Armis.htm to http://www.romanmap.com/htm/nomina/Armis.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

South Downs National Park

This article says that Arundel is outside the National Park, but the article on the National Park says it's inside!

Looking at the map on the National Park website, the boundary goes through Arundel. For example, the castle is inside.

So both articles are inaccurate! Mdrb55 (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

AAArrghh!

Too many bloody pictures. The layout looks awful. KJP1 (talk) 18:08, 8 December 2023 (UTC)