Talk:Arts & Letters Daily
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reverted deletions
editI reverted the deletions made in early May by an unregistered user. Sir, I'd be happy to keep the changes you made, but normal protocol on Wikipedia is to use the talkpage to explain any major deletions (or other edits) you make. Most of the edits you made were simple deletions of content that, as far as I know, was accurate (e.g. "Carol Gould suggested the name 'Arts & Letters Daily'). In future just make a note on this talkpage explaining why you are deleting sections of the page, and I'll be unlikely to revert your changes. Babajobu 19:12, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
The quotes
editThe quotes on this page about ALD are very positive. Though I'm personally a fan of the site I'm aware there are many negative ones out there. So if no one disagrees in the next week or two I'll find a few and put them on for a bit of balance. Unless someone beats me to it. Kansaikiwi 02:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Bias
editIs there a conservative or liberal bias on this page? I noticed a lot of conservative writers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.111.95.168 (talk) 23:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
As of now, start crediting sources
editI just completed a significant update to the article, introducing the use of references for the first time. Please don't add anything substantive without citing sources, keeping in mind Wikipedia's policies of no original research and a neutral point of view, among others. Thanks. 67.100.125.8 (talk) 23:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC).
File:Arts letters daily.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Arts letters daily.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Arts letters daily.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Arts & Letters Daily. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://chronicle.com/free/2002/10/2002102510n.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arts & Letters Daily. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307112136/http://archive.salon.com/tech/view/2000/11/03/dutton/index.html to http://archive.salon.com/tech/view/2000/11/03/dutton/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)