Talk:Artificial intuition

Latest comment: 7 years ago by CharlesGillingham in topic Source for the term
edit

Not sure if there is a reason why 'internal links' and 'see also' is separated into 2 sections. I'm going to combine them unless anyone knows why they shouldn't be. Churchgoer251 (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Makes sense to me. Soulparadox 04:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulparadox (talkcontribs)

Discussion section rewrite

edit

I took the liberty of rewriting the 'discussion' part, since it didn't bring any new facts to the table. I modified it to be a list of 'in fiction' references, which it was doing anyway. I am not sure why these fiction references were used, as they have no particular categories, and there are tons of AI references in movies and books. I hope this takes away a bit of the personal reflection or opinion essay problems. Blonkm (talk) 23:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Artificial intuition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Source for the term

edit

Is there a source that uses and defines the term "artificial intuition" (that isn't just a sales pitch)? How is this different than "sub-symbolic AI"? Do the people who define the term actually use all this stuff about Jung, etc.? ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 00:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tried to poke the original author, and, surprise surprise he is blocked. I will cut out links to this article from the central AI page. Please discuss if you are interested. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

This article was ALREADY DELETED. Would someone mind nominating it again? Thanks. ----CharlesGillingham (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2017 (UTC)dReply