Talk:Artificial brain

I believe this article should be deleted as it refers to something which does not exist. There are other articles which treat this subject properly as speculative fiction.

Benjamin Ostrow (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposal

To develop this article, it should bring together material from:

1. Mind uploading#Blue Brain Project and computational issues
2. Strong AI#Simulated human brain model

as well as other sources, such as The Singularity is Near by Ray Kurzweil, and perspectives from Neuroscience.

It should address the issues of:

1. How much computing power does the human brain use? (This should cite various predictions, by Hans Moravec, Ray Kurzweil and many others. Maybe a table would be good.)
2. When does Moore's Law predict that this much computing power will be available?
3. What are the prospects of duplicating the function of the nervous system and neural structures? How is it difficult? What are the issues?
4. Historical research approaches such as Pitts & McCullough, etc.
5. Current research approaches, such as Blue Brain, Artificial Intelligence System etc.
6. It should link to philosophy of artificial intelligence#The brain can be simulated and ethics of artificial intelligence.

Someday I

Header text	Header text	Header text
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example

may have time to do this. If anyone else has the inclination, feel free. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 00:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC) CharlesGillingham (talk) 18:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Updated ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 05:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

did some of this - in particular got some paras out of strong AI that fit better here Bitstrat (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Indented line —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.138.120.88 (talk) 11:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Brain death

Critics of the notion of brain death have sometimes argued that it could be invalidated by the futuristic existence of artificial brains, given that death in its broadest definition involves the entire body and that it happens on the cellular level, and not on any peculiar mnemonic level. Hence, if your brain unexpectedly dies, it might be replaced by one of these organic computer brains that would maintain your previous state of psychological consciousness, as one would store information on a computer disk. ADM (talk) 07:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Survey article: artificial brain projects

A 2010 article which surveys large-scale simulations of brains: article (sorry, paywall). I think it could be a useful reference material. Ben ^T/_C 08:24, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Artificial brain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629143518/http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=6&tid=18358 to http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=6&tid=18358

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

100 GW? WT*?

Isn’t “an order of 100,000” times more than a megawatt 100 gigawatts? Supercomputers only consume a few megawatts, not many gigawatts. I’m not so sure that the so-called “current supercomputer” can possibly use anywhere near 100 GW of power.

EDIT: Haha, I beat you to it, robot! 73.208.153.86 (talk) 23:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

That sentence appears to be clarifying that 1MW is an order of 100,000 more than 20W. I've changed the grammar a bit to help parsing that. (Still needs a citation though.) Tga (talk) 18:33, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

India Education Program course assignment

This article was the subject of an educational assignment at College Of Engineering Pune supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)