Talk:Arthur R. Smith
Latest comment: 7 years ago by TheVirginiaHistorian in topic Pulliam as a reliable source
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arthur R. Smith article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portrait request
edit | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Info box parameters for image and caption are supplied. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 10:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Pulliam as a reliable source
editPulliam is listed in William Hamilton Bryson’s “Virginia Law Books: essays and bibliographies, volume 239” (2000) on page 235.
David L. Pulliam, Jacob N. Brenaman and William J. Van Schreeven are referenced as reliable sources for “comprehensive analyses of Virginia Conventions” by the Constitutional scholar John J. Dinan in his Biographical Essay in his “The Virginia Constitution: a reference guide, part 56.” (2006) page 231. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 18:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)