Talk:Arthur Lewis Hall

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work!, I have marked it as reviewed. cheers!

Dcotos (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Chaiten1 (talk) Chaiten1 (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that from 1904 to 1911 Arthur Lewis Hall covered 17,479 miles (28,130 km), mostly by foot, to map the geology of the Transvaal? Source: https://journals.co.za/doi/epdf/10.10520/AJA10120750_2088
  • ALT1: ... that between 1904 and 1911 Arthur Lewis Hall mapped the geology across 16,388 square miles (42,440 km²) of the Transvaal, South Africa? Source: https://journals.co.za/doi/epdf/10.10520/AJA10120750_2088
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/August Palmisano

Created by Chaiten1 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Arthur Lewis Hall; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Starting review. Updates to follow. Ktin (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Ktin (talk)Thank you so much for the very helpful comments. I have implemented the suggestions to the text. Very happy with the suggestions to round the numbers quoted in the hook.Chaiten1 (talk)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article meets eligibility criteria for newness. Is long enough and no issues with neutrality / tone. Article is well-sourced to seemingly reputable journals. No issues there. I am assuming good faith on some of those, particularly ones that I can not access. Hooks are interesting and are well sourced. Was able to access the text. Have a few notes that I have included re: the hooks. Please see. QPQ done. Earwig shows no issues. Nice and clean article. Ktin (talk) 21:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Notes Below:

Hooks:

• Both hooks are interesting. Is there merit in rounding the numbers e.g. covered ~17,500 miles (~28,000 kms)?
• Can we add South Africa in the hook so folks who do not know the region know that we are talking about a province in SA?

Lede:

• Can we clarify / qualify what BIC was? i.e. in a phrase or two saying what BIC was and where it is.
• If the above is done you can separate the Royal society part into the next sentence

Body:

• In writing biographies, I have seen the sections -- Early life, Career (or alternately Works), and Personal life, be used. If you'd prefer the content can be reorganized that way
• Early life
  • Please can we add the date of birth in this section as well.
  • Who was Philip Lake? e.g. British geologist
  • Similarly, who was W.J. Lewis? e.g. South African explorer
• Career
  • I like the way you had conversions in the hook between miles and kms, consider the same in the article too. The numbers can remain precise here or rounded up / down based on your preference
  • Awards can be a sub-section under career or can be the last paragraph within career section
• Selected publications
  • Can you add ISBN numbers to the books, if available
• Personal life
  • Please add a line or two about death. The details are available in the first link

Overall, a very nice and neat article. Well done. Please address as you deem fit. Ktin (talk) 21:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

@Chaiten1: Please address the above. Z1720 (talk) 23:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

@Chaiten1: has not addressed the concerns above, so I am marking this for closure as unsuccessful. If Chaiten1 does not edit this soon, it should be formally rejected. Z1720 (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

I have implemented all of these suggestions, as far as possible. I have rearranged the content of the article, and extended or clarified sections. Books or monographs from the 1920s - 1930s don't have ISBN numbers, but the citations are complete.Chaiten1 (talk)

• . Approving both hooks. Preference is for ALT0. If needed, please feel free to round-up / round-down the miles. Ktin (talk) 01:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)