Requested move

edit
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Arsen Avakov (politician)Arsen Avakov – This guy is far more famous than the retired footballer whose article gets 300 views a month. --Relisted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:08, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Երևանցի talk 03:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. In my view, it should be Arsen Avakov (politician). But Arsen Avakov rename to Arsen Avakov (footballer). This two persons are dealing (or dealt) with two different and equivalent areas, it should be reflected here--Unikalinho (talk) 13:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

No, that would be unnecessary disambiguation. There are three options: (1) the footballer is primary topic, and the status quo is acceptable; (2) the politician is primary topic, and this move should occur; (3) there is no primary topic, and the base title should be a disambiguation page (this is somewhat discouraged by WP:TWODABS). --BDD (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Fenix down: What exactly is not clear? Google Arsen Avakov. Virtually every result is about this politician. --Երևանցի talk 15:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
He is a politician who only recently became a minister and has only been in the ukrainian parliament for little over two years. It's not like he has decades of national level political service or has held an extremely high rank for a number of years. I agree that this article probaly should be Arsen Avakov (footballer), but not that it should be moved so another individual can take the primary name, which is the proposal of this RM. A Disamb page would be preferable to me in this instance. Fenix down (talk) 16:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
He has been a politician since the early 2000s and is now a highly important member of a national government of the largest country in Europe. Does that not make him more notable than a football player whose article is a stub and who has played only for secondary clubs? --Երևանցի talk 17:50, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
He has been a regional politician for a number of years, he has only appeared on the national stage in the last couple of years. The footballer in question played international football for Tajikistan for a period of seven years and spent the best part of a decade playing in the top Soviet / Russian league for various clubs. I simply don't see anything at the moment that makes one or other of these individuals so much more prominent than the other that they should be considered the primary topic. The fact that one individual s retired from their profession is irrelevant. A disamb page seems the most appropriate solution here. Fenix down (talk) 10:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
This isn't about who was famous or notable decades ago, it's about who is more notable today. There's no doubt that Arsen the politician is more notable today. You may believe that a footballer was once more notable, but that shouldn't be the defining reason to have a disamb page. That will make it a tad bit more difficult for the thousands of readers who are searching for the politician. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EtienneDolet (talkcontribs) 20:37, 12 January 2015
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Arrested in absentia"

edit

Maybe this is common legal terminology, but the following sentence doesn't make sense to me: "On 9 July 2014, a Moscow district court arrested him in absentia." How can they arrest someone who is not there? I suppose it means that they issued an arrest warrant for him, but is it really common to call it "arresting" someone if they don't actually physically confine them? Ornilnas (talk) 03:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arsen Avakov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

The thing is that a resignation of a Ukrainian minister needs to be accepted by the parliament to take effect: as long as that has not happened the person is still incumbent.

edit

  Good luck with your winning the football pool StarDeg and Khronicle I; since you can look into the future... it is guaranteed you will win....   The thing is that a resignation of a Ukrainian minister needs to be accepted by the parliament to take effect: as long as that has not happened the person is still incumbent. Health Minister Alexander Kvitashvili in July 2015 wrote a letter of resignation, but the Ukrainian parliament never accepted his resignation; hence he stayed Health Minister until April 2016....

PS Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 15:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply