Talk:Arrowhead device

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Disruptive edits by YahwehSaves (a.k.a. 75.79.31.20) edit

YahwehSaves (a.k.a. 75.79.31.20), it appears you're trolling quite a few pages & creating edit wars. You've been warned, numerous times previously, about making such disruptive edits. If you wish your edits to take effect, you must: 1) Log in. 2) Follow thepolicies & guidelines, manual of style, and understand good faith. 3) Adhere to the agreed consensus of the article. As for the confusion with Matt Urban's accoutrements. Here's some clarity specific to the Arrowhead device.

  • Arrowhead device – Displayed at the Institute of Heraldry, IAW section 12 (Wear of Appurtenances), chapter 29 (Wear of Decorations, Service Medals, Badges, Unit Awards, and Appurtenances) of Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia), "Appurtenances are devices affixed to service or suspension ribbons, or worn in lieu of medals or ribbons. They are worn to denote an additional award, participation in a specific event, or some other distinguishing characteristic of an award. The following appurtenances are authorized for wear on decorations, medals, ribbons and other awards, when authorized by appropriate authority"
Paragraph f details the specifics of the Arrowhead. It is your freedom to call it an appurtenance, accoutrement, or device. Just understand exactly what those terms are used to describe. Ultimately, the article of the Arrowhead describes it as the Arrowhead device, in concert with the use of the term "device" in Awards and decorations of the United States military & United States military award devices. As such, the Arrowhead is, and shall remain, be described as a device, as is the consensus on the English Wikipedia. See also Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards). Bullmoosebell (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Service devices edit

The Army is not the only awards manual and not the most up-to-date service awards manual. The DoD, Army, Navy (USMC), Air Force, and Coast Guard award manuals do not use name "award device" for the arrowhead device or mention that the arrowhead device is "awarded for":

  • DoD Manual Nov. 23, 2010, 1348.33 V3, P. 1 (2), P. 7: "Lists authorized service devises (arrowhead device) and appurtenances for DoD awards and decorations".—Preceding unsigned comment added by YahwehSaves (talk) 01:45, 14 July 2012‎ (UTC) Reply
Actually AR 600–8–22 which is found here: [1] is more up to date than the manual you mention, it was last updated 15 September 2011. On page 93 they make reference to "award of the arrowhead device". Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 15:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arrowhead device. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply