Wikipedia

Talk:Arriva Trains Wales/Archive 1

< Talk:Arriva Trains Wales
Latest comment: 6 years ago by David Biddulph in topic Major Stations
Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Arriva trains wales logo.gif

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Arriva trains wales logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Photo of Class 175

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could someone please take a photo of an Arriva liveried Class 175 and upload it. This would be mean the copyrighted image could be replaced - it will most likely be deleted soon anyway as it has no fair use rationale, meaning there will be no picture at all. Thank you. --Jorvik 14:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

If someone gets a chance a 175 in ATW livery would look much better, all we have at the moment is in FNW. --Fuelboy (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Major Stations

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I note with some interest that Radyr and Grangetown, among others, have been added to the list of major stations in Wales served by AW. I cannot speak for Radyr, but I travel through Grangetown station regularly when going to Cardiff (from Penarth or Eastbrook) and it does not strike me as a particularly important station. Do people feel that it is major because of passenger numbers, as its role as an interchange between the Penarth and Barry lines (is this a journey often made by train?), or are there other reasons? I would appreciate similar explanations for Radyr.

And whilst I'm on this section, I'd like to question Manchester Oxford Road's credentials as a major station, particularly given that Picadilly is also listed. Any views?

Thank you for indulging me. Ansbaradigeidfran (talk) 22:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I added Grangetown and Radyr due to their large usage compared to other stations on the network. They have a larger usage than other stations already on the list. Radyr is used as an interchange but I don't believe Grangetown is. Welshleprechaun (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

No-one's come out in favour of Oxford Road, so I've removed it from the list. I don't feel it's anywhere near as major as Picadilly next door. I accept that Radyr warrants listing, but I don't feel that Grangetown is. I think there's room for more debate on these two. Ansbaradigeidfran (talk) 18:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

They run to Birmingham International (the airport) - can I add that as a 'major station'? Hayttom (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

The section heading is Major stations in Wales, so Birmingham International does not qualify. - David Biddulph (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Assessment

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this is probably top-scale start\low-scale B. Needs expansion in many areas though. Simply south (talk) 22:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Rolling Stock routes

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Class 158 is labelled as being used on the Cheltenham route, but Valley Lines suggests that these services are operated through to Maesteg. Is the 158 used here? Is it used to Maesteg too? Ansbaradigeidfran (talk) 17:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Swanline

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In rewriting this page, we have inadvertently broken Swanline, which redirects to the non-existent section Arriva Trains Wales#Swanline. Should we re-introduce this section in the ATW page, or reinstate Swanline? Ansbaradigeidfran (talk) 22:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Swanline is just the name of a service rather than a rail line so it shouldn't have a page of its own. There's nothing really notable about it other than what's already in the article. Welshleprechaun (talk) 18:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Welsh Language Services

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An IP-based editor has removed some portions of this section. I find that the section now reads more positive of ATW. As the original author of the removed text, I feel a bit of a conflict of interest, and am not sure which version gives the most balanced WP:NPOV. I would prefer other editors to look at the versions before and after (diff). Ansbaradigeidfran (talk) 18:14, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Seemingly little rolling stock investment

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

Why is it that Arriva Trains Wales don't seem to invest very much money in new rolling stock, when other providers do? First Great Western and London Midland both operate in some areas that Arriva Trains Wales does, but they have far more up-to-date trains. The Heart of Wales line is the worst - the trains here are ancient and generally uncomfortable and even dirty. Why can't they purchase some decent trains like London Midland do? 84.69.54.20 (talk) 02:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

It ultimately comes down to what governments are willing to fund, and even if Arriva paid for it themselves, it would still need government approval as a worthwhile and sustainable expense because of the way the franchising system works. Despite the so-called ‘privatisation’ of British Rail, the train operating companies have very little autonomy in such matters. David Arthur (talk) 15:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeh they suck. Their trains are rubbish. I want new trains —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.70.80.77 (talk) 20:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

got to agree with ya —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.64.236.191 (talk) 23:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Because the franchies was let under the agreement of the DFT/SRA that there will be no growth and the operator does not need to provide it. They are the people that need to answer that question. Arrive could of been anyone NX, First etc it makes no diffrence the owner, the outcome would have been the same NO GROWTH NO NEW UNITS NEEDED.

PLEASE CAN PPL STOP CHANGING IMAGES OF THE ARRIVA TRAIN LIVERY. ARRIVA TRAINS WALES HAVE PLACES THE PICTURES FOR ADVERTISEMENT PURPOSES, AND FELLOW USERS CHANGING IT AFFECTS ARRIVA'S PUBLICATION. SO PLEASE LEAVE THE PICTURES ALONE. THANK YOU. Arriva Trains Wales (Arriva Trenau Cymru) part of the Arriva company and National Rail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.194.231.189 (talk) 21:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arriva Trains Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arriva Trains Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arriva Trains Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arriva Trains Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Arriva_Trains_Wales/Archive_1&oldid=863942746"