Talk:Army men

I'm wondering if

there needs to be an "Americanizing" of the language and spelling because this is an American toy. Thoughts? Edwartica (talk) 20:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

This could be expanded. For example, who came up with the design of this popular toy? SteelyDave 05:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, and ways to play with said toys. --Goonka 07:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Is it just me, or is the last part about super soldiers just a tad humorous!

Yes, it is.

I think we can include a link to tin soldiers, because these are clearly predecessors to plastic soldiers. - Redmess 13:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Childhood Violence

Any ideas why in a world in which watchdog groups will pounce on any form of media with depictions of violence that could be acessible to kids, that few, if any, seem to think there's a problem with allowing children to play with toys designed to simulate warfare? Food for thought. --66.253.36.46 (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Not sure, but maybe because even they aren't that big wheenies? Epstein's Mother (talk) 03:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Super Soldiers

I'm not really sure what that whole thing with "super soldiers" is, but maybe we should include a section about mutilation of army men instead of it. - MaxW 12:21, 5 November 2006

??

No pictures? Not even 8 paragraphs? Geez this needs expanding. Colonel Marksman 17:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Misinformation?

In the article, it says that 3DO made a series of "real-time strategy" games. I've played almost every single army men game, and I wouldn't call ANY of the games real-time strategy... but then again, I can't think of what type they are at all... any one got any suggestions? Maybe action-strategy? You control almost exclusively "Sarge", so would it be an action-RPG? Help me out here and we can change it. Kelpie K 19:08, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

what kind of plastic

PLEASE mention what is the specific kind of plastic used to make those extremely inexpensive toys. Is it liner low-density polyethylene? is it polystyrene? (doubt it) Thank you. I'd add to it if I knew. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.216.164 (talk) 04:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Airfix54mm.JPG Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Airfix54mm.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

As the contributor, I oppose the deletion of this image and, quite frankly, fail to understand the rationale. Does this mean that one needs to get permission from the manufacturer in order to take pictures of any purchased item? I have trouble imagining the justification of such a bizarrely restrictive policy. --Jcbutler (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Army men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141230180806/http://www.filmfactoryentertainment.com/ficha.php?id=99 to http://www.filmfactoryentertainment.com/ficha.php?id=99

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

EngVar

This article uses "color" and "colour" with equal frequency. I haven't spotted any other EngVar tells. Which way should we standardize? --Khajidha (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Colour is always the way to go since original British English predates American English and all its misspellings. 02:17, 19 July 2020 (GMT)

Well, I don't think that's right. Clearly many articles are in "American English" and Wikipedia originated in America. I believe the standard rule here is to preserve the form of English that was used when the article was originally created. Jcbutler (talk) 15:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)