This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello. I'm from the United States, I do work for Wikipedia on World War I, and finding quality info on the Army Council is really hard. Leo Amery, in one of his many books, said, "It's really nothing. Not to worry about it." I have military experience, I know what a promotion board is, and I think that's what the Army Council is. Here's what I'm trying to find out: General Hubert Gough was relieved of command and placed on half pay in 1918, but who did it? Here's the chain of command: Prime Minister Lloyd George / Secretary of State for War Lord Milner / General Henry Wilson (CIGS) / General Douglas Haig (CIC) / Hubert Gough. Gough was replaced by General Rawlinson (from Versailles), who reformed Gough's army into the 4th Army. I'm certain the decision came from Lloyd George. However, could the Army Council have played a role? Thank you. Lord Milner (talk) 19:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
.svg)
