Talk:Armorial of the Communes of Nord (A–C)

Contesting the proposed deletion of this page

Fram proposed deleting this page and 4 others. Since they are all similar, there's no need to discuss all 5 separately.

1) Heraldry, while largely neglected in modern days, is an ancient and honourable art. Armoury (in this case Coats of Arms, with their images (emblazons) and technical heraldic descriptions (blazons) are very important to the people and communities that possess them. 2) Providing, in a single place, the collected armoury of a given department seemed an appropriate thing to do. 3) this information is not available in a single place anywhere else (in English or in Commons, AFAIK) - to get the equivalent information one would have to peruse literally hundreds of individual town's pages. Or one would have to be able to read the French originals. 4) While English Wiki policies differ from French ones, as I have recently discovered, the fact that every (mainland) department of France has an Armorial on French wiki seemed (and seems) to me to be a prima facie case for the appropriateness here. Prima facie = grounds for initially supposing, rather than proof. --David V Houston (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Coat of arms in question

The blazon for Anhiers reads: *"Per fess Or and azure, 3 fleurs de lys counterchanged." but the "fleurs de lys" are not specified in their arrangement. Since they are countercharged they should straddle the parted line. --Xavier (talk) 03:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Cleaned up syntax

There are many Wiki syntax issues with this article and its alphabetized related articles. I cleaned up many of them just now. --Xavier (talk) 17:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Armorial of the Communes of Nord-1 (A–C). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090308004934/http://www.bouchain.fr:80/histoire/histoire.asp?rubrique_id=6 to http://www.bouchain.fr/histoire/histoire.asp?rubrique_id=6
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100102125340/http://www.ville-bourbourg.com:80/presentation_haut.htm to http://www.ville-bourbourg.com/presentation_haut.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090519185938/http://membres.lycos.fr:80/paleographie/heraldique/sommaire.html to http://membres.lycos.fr/paleographie/heraldique/sommaire.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 18 October 2016 (UTC)