 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
NPOV dispute
editThis page seems to have a pro-Ukrainian bias, I think it is better to reword the phrasing to make it more neutral. Nar 2608 (talk) 13:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- What is biased about it? —Michael Z. 00:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- The use of strong terms in the introduction such "illegal occupation" was what made me make this comment: for the example I gave before, simply saying "occupation" would be enough and then the term could be linked to an article discussing the occupation in a more detailed manner rather than simply stating "oh it's illegal" Nar 2608 (talk) 14:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Stating the fact is not “strong” or “biased.” It is neutral. —Michael Z. 20:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Exactly. Stating a fact regognised by International Law is not "biased" even though in Russian mindset facts are often lies and war is peace. --Smörre (talk) 11:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- The use of strong terms in the introduction such "illegal occupation" was what made me make this comment: for the example I gave before, simply saying "occupation" would be enough and then the term could be linked to an article discussing the occupation in a more detailed manner rather than simply stating "oh it's illegal" Nar 2608 (talk) 14:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Edit warring
edit@No,see you at school, please respect WP:BRD and don’t edit-war.[1] —Michael Z. 03:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)