Talk:Armenian Nuclear Power Plant

Comment

I'd suggest Metsamor,unless someone is strongly attached to the current title.

I think the two names are more or less interchangeable. Feel free to change the title. -- Augustgrahl 00:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I'd go for Metsamor and a redir from here, either way it should be consisten with the article about the city Metsamor.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED, uncontroversially, some days ago. -GTBacchus^(talk) 02:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

Medzamor Nuclear Power Plant → Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant — (Relisting, originally proposed by 212.76.33.86). Eastern Armenian seams more appropriate since the plant is in the Republic of Armenia Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Survey

Add  * '''Support'''  or  * '''Oppose'''  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Metsamor NPP Issue following the Japan Quake

In light of what has happened at Fukushima recently and considering that the NPP at Metsamor is located within a seismically active region that has experienced devastating earthquakes in the recent past, the safety of this plant really needs to be evaluated closely. Besides, the operating standards at Metsamor are far inferior to those of the Fukushima plant and there are no plans at this point to close it down. Following the experience of Japan though, this will probably change taking note of the fact that the continued operation of this plant is unjustified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.43.1.66 (talk) 05:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

First of all thanks for your opinion, but what has it to do with Wikipedia? And the Metsamor Nuclear Plant provides almost 40% of Armenia's electricity. What alternative energy source you know? The plant has already been shut down once after Spitak earthquake and began working in 1995, as there was energy shortage.--Aram-van (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Aram-van, Armenia no longer needs Metsamor, because in April 2010, a new 242 MW natural-gas fired thermal power plant was brought online in Yerevan, and by summer 2011 (in a few months) a similar-sized thermal power plant (the fifth block at Hrazdan TPP) will be brought online. Metsamor only generates about 310 MW of power on average yearly. These two power plants combined will produced 50% more: around 450 MW. There is little justification left to building a new nuclear power plant in Armenia. It is simply too expensive. The same power can be generated at less 20% the cost using natural-gas power plants, which are also safer, cheaper to operate, and pose no existential threat to the Armenian people. Serouj (talk) 20:28, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

NPOV on National Geographic Source

NG is known to have taken partisan stances on Armenian issues and is not a credible source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.203.112 (talk) 13:20, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

1982 fire incident

I just heard that there was a fire incident in 1982. All workers escaped, and the cooling circulation pumps was not working for several hours. Weird enough, it was very hard for me to find references through google (maybe it's easier if searching in Russian or Armenian language), only a footnote in http://cns.miis.edu/npr/pdfs/bukhar42.pdf plus some few lines in a report on http://www.nrpa.no/dav/acbf34257c.pdf (both documents taking this as examples that this reactor design can stay without active cooling for several hours without any radioactive releases).

I heard the downtime cited as 6 hours according to an employee working there during the incident, the two PDF files I found through google states 4 and 5 hours.

If someone would care doing more research into this, it's probably worth mentioning in the article.

tobixen (talk) 19:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Proper name

I corrected the name of PP, but I guess the article is to be renamed according to its official name, -- Zara-arush (talk) 11:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

1989 earthquake? not 1988?

The text mentions that "After the earthquake in 1989 USSR Ministers Council decided that the existing two units of the NPP must shut down". No citation is provided. Sure is it 1989? Because I have found nothing about that earthquake here in wikipedia, but there is a 1988 Armenian earthquake. I suspect it could be this one, but I have no hard evidence. Maybe you guys know something about it. MOUNTOLIVE _{fedeli alla linea} 22:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927003219/http://www.nti.org/db/nisprofs/armenia/bkgndrep.htm to http://www.nti.org/db/nisprofs/armenia/bkgndrep.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://today.hetq.am/en/society/sargsyan/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030212346/http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=12002684&PageNum=0 to http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=12002684&PageNum=0
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110531152752/http://www.arka.am/eng/energy/2008/10/24/11736.html to http://www.arka.am/eng/energy/2008/10/24/11736.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.powrea.htm?country=AM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Copy editing

Hello, spotted this on articles in need of copy editing so adjusted some of it to make sense.

  DipperDolphin |talk  10:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)