Talk:Armen Harutyunyan

A. Haratyunyan is a judge at the ECHR since 17 Dec 2015.

In a letter from Strasbourg court from 17th March 2016 it is stated that

"..that the European Court of Human Rights, sitting in a single judge formation (Harutyunyan assisted by a rapporteur in accordance with Article 24 Par 2 of the Convention) between 25 February 2016 and 10 March 2016, decided to declare your application inadmissible. This decision was delivered on the last mentioned date.

In the lights of all the material in its posession and in so far as the matters complained are within its competence, the court found that the admissibikity criteria set out in Article 34 and 35 of the convention have not been met.

This decision is final. It is not subject to an appeal either to the Grand Chamber or to any other body. The Registry is unable to provide you with any further details concerning the Single Judge's decision. Consequently, you will not receive any further correspondence with this case. In accordance with the Courts's instructions, the file will be destroyed one year after the date of the Single Judge's decision.

The present communication is made pursuant to Rule 52A of the Rules of Court.

Yours faithfully, For the court M. Lafferty Legal Secretary."

What is very Strange:

1. There has been a previous application that was rejected from M. Lafferty requesting more information about the international EU Proceedings. This judge is neither a citizen of a EU member state neither it seems he has experience with the European Union.
2. This judge was allowed to make such a fundamental decision between two and less than three months aftnhe has taken up the position.
3. The charter of fundamental rights require a public hearings. When it comes to decisions from Strasbourg Court this is completely violated.
4. Whats the role of M. Lafferty who seems to be a british citizen systematically blocking cases against UK?
5. In the case mentioned there were several hearings at the EU PETI comittee which show that there has been a systematic denial of paternal cintact with the child.

• https://archive.org/details/20140319PetitionSpeechDiscussion12292013EN
• https://archive.org/details/20141111BrusselsPetition12292013KZCompleteEN
• https://archive.org/details/20151203EuropeanParliamentPetitonSpeechDiscussion12292013EN

The Human Rights court in Strasbourg was requested to investigate violations of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. But the Strasbourg court seems not to care.

Klaus zinser (talk) 10:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armen Harutyunyan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130114172950/http://www.ombuds.am/main/en/1/3/ to http://www.ombuds.am/main/en/1/3/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)