Talk:Argus Monitor

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

speedy deletion edit

I have added a page using the page of a established entry (Speedfan) as an template. This program is practically the same (even though slighly more ugly) as Argus Monitor and has a page about it here since Jan 2007. Mrmagmrmag (talk) 12:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • I've declined the speedy deletion, but I've also had to remove part of the article that was copy/pasted from [1]. If it is to continue to be kept, it will of course need some reliable sources to verify the content and establish notability for this software. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Argus Monitor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply