Talk:Areopagus Lodge

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Notability? edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have to question whether this lodge is really notable by Wikipedia's standards (most local Masonic lodges are not... even the oldest ones). Please see: WP:ORG (the notability guideline that covers the topic area)... essentially what is needed is significant coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the subject to demonstrate notability. The lodge website is not enough (as it is not independent of the subject). Do such sources exist? Blueboar (talk) 02:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic