Talk:Area code 360

List of Cities?

The article about the area code 425 has a list of cities who use it, but 360 doesn't. Thanks, from a miscellaneous IP address.

71.197.205.16 07:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

topology

Is it worth mentioning that 360 is (and apparently always has been) split into disjoint pieces by 206/253/425? Many maps don't show that detail clearly. —Tamfang (talk) 08:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia used to have nice maps. I am very sad about the present situation. The map in this article is pitiful to the point of less-than-useless. Sadsaque (talk) 17:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Area code 360. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325100800/http://www.areacodedownload.com:80/360/index.html to http://www.areacodedownload.com/360/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Contiguous or not

A quibble but the area is only non-contiguous across land. The county boundaries touch in Puget Sound so, technically, Snohomish is contiguous with Kitsap, and with Island, so there is continuity. - Brianhe (talk) 05:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

I guess that depends on your definition of "contiguous". Per Contiguity#Geography, "Political or geographical land divisions that, as a group, are not interrupted by other land or water are contiguous." What definition are you using? - BilCat (talk) 06:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Snohomish County is not interrupted by water from Kitsap County because Puget Sound is approximately half in one county and half in the other. In other words, there is no water separating the two counties except that which is in one county or the other. There is no other land or water thus no interruption. - Brianhe (talk) 06:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

I think the point of the comment is that the land doesn't touch directly. But if it's that much of an issue to you, then remove it as an unsourced claim/original research. Trying to clarify it to include the land part would only open it up for another semantic quibble yet to be thought of. - BilCat (talk) 06:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Well, I gave it a try. Quibbles are what we are all about :) - Brianhe (talk) 22:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

I'll let you handle the next quibble that comes up regarding this. Hopefully, it'll seem silly to you, but of life or death importance to that quibbler. :) - BilCat (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)