Talk:Arctic oscillation

Arctic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Climate / General Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Climate task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Weather pattern instead of climate pattern edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The current article text contains the quote:

"The harsh winter weather was attributed to a negative Arctic Oscillation, which is a climate pattern that influences weather in the Northern Hemisphere."

While I am not at all saying that a quote should be altered, I think this quote warrants a comment to the effect of:

"A negative Arctic Oscillation is not a climate pattern (and does not even seem to be much of an oscillation, seeing that it is called negative) but a weather pattern, since it is a transient weather pattern, i.e. one that does not occur (consistently) on climatological time scales."

I lack enough specialist knowledge in the field to object to the "Arctic Oscillation" (without the adjective "negative") being called a climate pattern. The oscillation itself might well be a climate pattern, particularly if it can be ascribed to or even is a direct physical phenomenon rather than a by-product of several separate physical phenomena.Redav (talk) 13:39, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic