Talk:Arcimoto
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This is a US company and therefore the article should use mdy dates
editNotwithstanding that the Template:Use dmy dates has been placed in the article for many years, the subject is clearly American, therefore the month should appear before the day, per MOS:DATETIES. My Gussie (talk) 03:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Also, the use of abbreviated numerical dates in citations is entirely acceptable, per MOS:DATEUNIFY. My Gussie (talk) 03:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)HUMAYUNSK
Please let me finish my edits before deleting
editCould you give me a couple days to add in the links before deleting everything added in a single day, User:Dgpop? Thanks a ton. I am adding stuff, then adding the references, and ensuring it reads like Tesla's page, which is, apparently, acceptable. Is it normal for someone to come behind another editor and just delete whole cloth before the sections are finished? User:harriska2 —Preceding undated comment added 02:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Issues that need correction
editAfter coming across this article, I'm concerned about the state of this article about Arcimoto. First, the history sub-section should be about the company's corporate history. Not an entire sub-section that serves as a persuasive essay about the benefits or virtues of Arcimoto's vehicle designs. Second, the entire executive section is just a collection of resumes, and seemingly highlights the executives of Arcimoto. Third, the products/vehicle section is way too detailed for an article about the company as a whole. Finally, the article needs more citations in general. The state of this page is unacceptable as Arcimoto is a publicly traded company, and readers will want to come to this article for more information on a company that they may invest money into. Leiwang7 (talk) 06:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
I have removed the following from the article per WP:RS as mentioned. I am placing it here in hopes a reliable source can be found and added to the article.
Batteries
edit...
<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://m.facebook.com/groups/343218869645332/permalink/458204971480054/|title=Log into Facebook}}</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=April 2021|certain=y}}</ref>
...
---> Darryl.P.Pike (talk) 16:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)