Talk:Archival Resource Key

Latest comment: 6 months ago by 73.223.72.200 in topic Not entirely sure that anatomy of an ARK is correct

How to use in browser edit

Please expand the section on how to use in a browser. The article shows a sample structure:

[http://NMAH/]ark:/NAAN/Name[Qualifier]

but could benefit from "live" examples which are accessible.

Also, please explain this statement: While ARKs have application in identifier persistence, the ARK scheme sees persistence as purely a matter of service and not a property of a naming syntax. — Senator2029  talk 01:38, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

This article was edited as part of an edit-a-thon edit


This article was edited as part of the San Francisco WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon. The editor who attended the event may be a new editor. In an effort to support new editor's & a healthy environment, please assume good faith to their contributions before making changes. Thank you! Sarah (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Not entirely sure that anatomy of an ARK is correct edit

Currently the first paragraph of the entry contains the following:

An ARK contains the label ark: after the URL's hostname,...

But I believe this in fact should read "after the URL's pathname". It just so happens that all of the example ARK URLs that I find have an empty path, like http://myrepo.example.org/ark:/12345/bcd987 . So the offending text doesn't look like an error but I'm pretty sure that it is.

I don't want to change it because I had not heard of ARKs before about 15 minutes ago and am a little unsure that I'm correct.

--Nc4096 (talk) 04:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC):Reply

That whole paragraph is kind of incomprehensible; someone familiar with the spec would need to explain what was meant. As is, it's clearly wrong (taken literally, it means https://en.wikipedia.orgark:/??). 73.223.72.200 (talk) 00:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply