Talk:Archie Marshall (politician)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Pigsonthewing in topic Ward
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes. |
Ward edit
Hello... Is there any record of Marshall being taken to task for his unethical conduct during the Stephen Ward trial?
By not admitting possible perjury by Kristine Keeler he allowed the jury to consider her testimony unchallenged.
Knightley, Phillip; Kennedy, Caroline (1987). An Affair of State: The Profumo Case and the Framing of Stephen Ward. London: Jonathan Cape. ISBN 0-224-02347-0.
Hesweeney (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I was the creator of the article and chose not to go into the trial at any length. As regards his trial conduct, you seem to have answered your own question. Perhaps the article on the trial will reveal more and if it doesn't..... Graemp (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- This is a shocking omission, which means that the article is not neutral. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- We should be careful not to lean too much towards the Stephen Ward fanclub position. And details of individual trials belong more properly in the articles about those trials than in the articles about judges. DuncanHill (talk) 17:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- But subsequent criticism of a judge for what is said to be highly improper behaviour belongs in their biography. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- We should be careful not to lean too much towards the Stephen Ward fanclub position. And details of individual trials belong more properly in the articles about those trials than in the articles about judges. DuncanHill (talk) 17:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)