Talk:Araguaian river dolphin

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Source I found

edit

[1] Here ya go! :) Bananasoldier (talk) 03:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's not a bad article, but essentially all the information in it is taken from the primary source, so we don't gain much by citing it. WolfmanSF (talk) 05:40, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Which species did we think it was before?

edit

I'm getting the impression the population hasn't been recently discovered, we've known about it for ages but only this year found out/declared that it is a new species. So which species did we think it belonged to before? Article says it's an inia, and it says it's most closely related to the Amazon river dolphin. Although it doesn't specifically state it one could presume it was previously thought of as belonging to Amazon river dolphin species, but it should state this if it is the case, so we don't have to guess or presume. Carlwev (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Done. WolfmanSF (talk) 19:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm also wondering who 'announced" this in 2014. Does the publication of an article make this "official"? Isn't there an international taxonomic society that determines these things? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 09:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Generally speaking, the publication of a peer-reviewed article proposing taxonomic changes makes it official, since it will have been reviewed by top experts in the field. However, that does not guarantee that everyone will agree. WolfmanSF (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Araguaian river dolphin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply