Talk:Aquilegia formosa

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Common name edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Crimson columbine? I consulted three websites (http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/imagecollection.php?ID=3672, http://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=AQFO, http://eol.org/pages/594620/names/common_names) and four field guides. Most don't mention "crimson" and all prefer either "western" or "red". The article calls "red columbine" ambiguous. No doubt somewhere is another species commonly called (somewhere) red columbine, but that is precisely why we have scientific names, to avoid ambiguity. If someone invented "crimson columbine" just to eliminate ambiguity in scientific references, then it is an invalid common name. Wildbirdz (talk) 23:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)Reply