Talk:Aqueduct (band)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Concern of subject of article edit

Seeing as how the link to Aqueduct's 2005 album clearly cites major music review sites shows that Aqueduct is of concern of enough people and notable by Wikipedia's standards. They also released a new album a week ago, so their popularity should fluctuate because of this. They are also signed to Barsuk records which is a notable music entity. Both of these are criterion clearly stated in the music notability section. Because of those 2 reasons I'm removing the tag at the top of the article. I encourage anybody with concerns to voice them on the talk page. --CountCrazy007 02:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aqueduct (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply